Required Author Attestation

All evaluations under the Human Standard™ begin with a required attestation completed by the author and, where applicable, the publisher and any additional contributors.

This attestation provides a structured account of how the work was created, including:

Submissions are only accepted once a complete and accurate attestation has been provided.

This requirement establishes a transparent and accountable foundation for evaluation under the Human Standard™.

Custom Authorship Analysis

A custom-built AI authorship assistant, developed by the Human Standard Institute™, analyzes linguistic patterns, structure, and stylistic signals associated with AI-assisted or AI-generated content.

The system is designed specifically for authorship evaluation within publishing contexts, supporting consistent and scalable analysis.

This step provides an informed assessment to support review, not a final determination.

Expert Human Evaluation

Based on the topic and genre of the work, the Human Standard Institute selects from a curated network of trained human reviewers to evaluate the content.

Each reviewer applies a consistent, structured assessment framework to provide an informed, independent perspective on authorship and the level of human involvement.

1

Authenticity of Voice

Does the work reflect a natural, human voice with nuance, variation, and intent?

2

Originality and Insight

Does the content demonstrate original thinking, perspective, or lived experience?

3

Structural Coherence

Does the organization of ideas reflect deliberate construction and flow?

4

Depth and Specificity

Does the work include concrete detail and contextual depth?

5

Overall Human Presence

Does the work reflect meaningful human direction and authorship?

This evaluation ensures that human judgment plays a central role in the final designation.

Assignment of Classification

Following analysis and review, content is assigned a designation under the Human Standard:

Each designation reflects the level of human involvement in the final work, based on a consistent application of the standard.

Additional Inputs

Where applicable, information provided through attestation is considered alongside analysis and review to support accurate classification.

All inputs are evaluated as part of a structured and consistent process.

Designed for Consistent Application

The Human Standard is designed to be applied across an organization’s content, enabling publishers to establish clear, repeatable practices for transparency.

Built for Practical Use

The process is designed to integrate with real publishing workflows, balancing rigor with usability.

The goal is to provide a clear and credible way to communicate how content is created, without disrupting production.

Apply the Human Standard

Work with the Human Standard Institute to implement a structured and consistent approach to content verification across your organization.